Discrimination Against Blacks

Race issues aren't always against people of color

This is a response to the column by DeWayne Wickham, "Disrespect toward Obama goes beyond the debt fight," that there is an air of "subtle racism" by the Repub-licans, namely Sen. Mitch McConnell and Rep. Eric Cantor. While blaming every Republican politician and accusing every known opponent of the president's policies of being a racist, seems to be the "thing to do," Mr. Wickham does have a point, but it's not as he thinks.

Yes, there is an air of racism when it pertains to the president and his relationship to caucasians. I believe the far-left liberals and the far-left wing of the Democratic Party, as well as African-Americans with far-left and militant views on race and race relations, themselves practice racism in the reverse. Just as the "Old white Southerners" practiced racism in the past, supporters of the president, simply handed him the keys to the highest office in the land solely based on the color of his skin.

This is an example of open, blatant acts of "racism in reverse" and race baiting by far-left leaning liberals both black and white that exists today. And God-forbid, if anyone opposes him, then they're automatically accused on being racist. Furthermore, if you happen to be African-American, and you oppose him then they're accused of being an "Uncle Tom" or a "Sellout."

Either way you look at it no matter who does it, it's wrong. I have yet to see the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton speak out against discrimination of white people, or any other minority, nor have I seen Louis Farrakhan shake hands with a white man. Why? Because they're just as racist against whites as David Duke and Adolf Hitler.

Because of this, we have a president who is so entrenched in far-left in ideology that he will not compromise and in return it causes the right to not want to compromise. This president, who is weak, thin-skinned, has no leadership skills, no executive experience, and his economic policies are disastrous, as was proven by the recent credit downgrade and continued high unemployment. Despite massive spending.

And who gets kicked in the teeth?

The ordinary folks trying to hold onto what little they have. The president is the "CEO" of this nation, he is the manager and as "The buck stopped with Harry Truman," it'll stop with Obama in 2012.

Obama regime impoverishes Whites to raise up Blacks and Latinos ...

By Jeff Davis

The long and the short of it all is that the Obama Agenda is based on a massive redistribution of wealth from the shrinking White population to the increasing millions of Black and Brown people. The few Black and Brown yuppies who have good paying jobs and who actually pay some taxes, need an asterisk because the vast majority of Black and Brown yuppies got their jobs thanks to racial quotas –at the expense of a White person, who must spend additional months looking for work until he or she gets a lower-paying second rate job.

As if stealing jobs through racial quotas and creating a massive tax burden isn’t bad enough, some liberal in Congress devised the idea of a “tan tax”.

The Washington Post reports: “Mention the new ‘tan tax’ in a major news outlet and cries of discrimination and reverse racism often follow. The complaint surfaced on reader comment boards to blogs and news Web sites back in December, when it became clear that the levy — a 10 percent surcharge on the use of ultraviolet tanning beds — was likely to be included in the new health-care overhaul bill. Since then, it’s been repeated by conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Doc Thompson, a fill-in host for Glenn Beck who intoned in March, ‘I now know the pain of racism.’ ”

Whites have known the pain of racial discrimination since the early 1970s, ever since racial quotas and Affirmative Action became the law of the land.

The Post article notes “When an article about the fallout from the tax — which took effect last week — appeared on the Washington Post’s Web site Wednesday, dozens of commenters questioned the tax’s legality. The case can seem deceptively simple: Since patrons of tanning salons are almost exclusively white, the tax will be almost entirely paid by white people and, therefore, violates their constitutional right to equal protection under the law. But does the argument have any merit? Not remotely said Randall Kennedy, a professor at Harvard Law School specializing in racial conflict and law. ‘There is no constitutional problem at all, because a plaintiff would have to show that the government intended to disadvantage a particular group, not simply that the group is disadvantaged in effect,’ he said.”

Universities used to admit only the people with the best SAT scores until some judge ruled this practice was discriminatory because it resulted in de facto discrimination. Funny how the Jews and liberals keep doing back flips to say discrimination against Whites is OK and discrimination against Blacks –even if it results from color-blind testing is NOT OK.

The inequality of pay

Black Enterprise

Race, work, and family in the lives of African Americans

Atlas of African-American history

Jet